How does FMM work?
It is a simple and demonstrable fact of human existence that all parts
of the body were designed to move freely through a ”design range.”
This design range is easy to ascertain when applied to joints but much
more difficult for myofascial structures. It is easy to see that an
elbow joint must be kept fully mobile, something that everyone does
instinctively, but it is not so easy to discover what is the full and
free range of, for example, the trapezius muscle. It is exactly this
that has enabled the pioneers to establish what should be the correct
range - this can be felt by the sensitive hand but cannot be deduced
from observation which is a vastly important part of FMM Our endeavour
is to teach you to feel what is not as it should be - and what is not
a "healthy feel".
It is equally demonstrable that preventing a healthy and disease-free
joint anywhere in the body from being able AT WILL to move through its
design range , will produce what we term CONGESTION. All joints are
flow systems--so blood and lymph and of course nerve signals must not
be interefered with --if they are pain will result. It is generally
either suppressed or at best completely misunderstood.
It is very common for humans from an early age to incur some loss of
range in a joint or a group of muscles. Many times this is ignored,
especially when this is in a child The parents are generally badly advised
by those who say that such pains are simply “growing pains”.
The problems begin early in life and unless resolved early - which they
seldom are - grow into the gross contractures and stiff bodies that
we have worked on for all these years. The origin of many problems is
the numerous falls which children have --so few see this as a very significant
origin because the minor damage to fascia repairs but gross distortions
occur which are seldom recognised. Yoga highlights these during the
diagnostic process.
A fundamental principle is that loss of range causes malfunction, disability
and pain and all these can be removed by judicious application of mobilisation
techniques almost regardless of the age of the person and the severity
of the condition.. Those over 80 years of age respond just as well as
those under 8--the problem for the older person is that they simply
do not BELIEVE it is possible for anyone to fix them!! Some can be fixed
easily .
The term mobilisation must not be confused with manipulation so beloved
of chiropractors and osteopaths, much of which is a failure. Where muscle
is badly contractured so there will be immobile joints attending this
and the cycles will maintain each other for the life of the patient
unless intelligent intervention occurs. Thus FMM is not a collection
of techniques but a mind-set, a way of seeing bodies. When the correct
tools are removed from the tool box and applied to the sufferer, success
is almost guaranteed, as much because the patient is empowered to self-help.
This has created another simple principle - that the practitioner of
FMM applies from the OUTSIDE those modalities that are considered to
be necessary from the results of the physical examination whilst the
patient applies those ancient principles of yoga which work from the
INSIDE. When both occur failure is so rare that it can almost safely
be disregarded. This fact is hidden from patients often because of gross
ignorance on the part of therapists who consider that they have all
the faculties for cure--this is a serious error and explains the high
failure rate. Indeed, if the average patient had the experiences he
has from therapy applied to his car repair he would never bother visiting
a garage again!
Even without the patient doing anything , the processes result in around
95% success rate just because the investigative processes are so thorough
and the absence of smoke screens that the practioner can apply! By this
is meant that much therapy has employed Latin words and complex definitions
of what is wrong which easily convince the patient of her ignorance
and discourage the process of questionning. Fmm has none of this--if
it cannot be simply explained to the patient then the practitoner cannot
persuade herself that she really understands what is going on SO---must
divulge this lack of understanding and hence cannot produce a smoke
screen to hide behind. We have lists of the so-called explanations offered
by therapists--some of them are mind-blowing in their complexity. The
complexity is proportional to their capacity to confuse! There is. thus,
no hiding place --the practioner must be utterly honest and accept this
as part of the process of discovery. Thus the patient and the practitioner
engage fully in the business of TRUST.
